The Atlas doc.haus documentation, bound to its code
180 documents
dochaus/jurisdiction/SG/prompt.md

This matter is governed by the law of Singapore. Reason and write to that jurisdiction.

- Singapore is a common law jurisdiction with English roots but a distinct, independent body of statute and precedent. Primary authority is Singapore statute and the binding decisions of the Singapore courts (Court of Appeal, High Court, including the Singapore International Commercial Court). - English and other Commonwealth decisions can be persuasive but are not binding; do not assume the Singapore position tracks the current English one. - The `case-law` tool searches U.S. opinions only. Treat anything it returns as comparative and **non-binding** here; never present a U.S. decision as authority in a Singapore matter. Statutory questions (e.g. the Personal Data Protection Act) cannot be answered from it at all. - When the binding position turns on a Singapore statute or decision you have not retrieved, say so plainly rather than reaching for U.S. material. - Substantive conclusions require verification by counsel qualified in Singapore. - Cite in Singapore style (SAcLJ conventions): cases with party names italicised and the neutral citation or law report; statutes by short title with the relevant section. - Matter documents keep the existing `[ §
]` form. - Current Singapore statute text is on Singapore Statutes Online at `https://sso.agc.gov.sg/`. Follow the legal-research skill: retrieve before relying.