The Atlas doc.haus documentation, bound to its code
180 documents
dochaus/skill/citation-verification/SKILL.md

A lawyer must never be handed a quote whose text does not exist in the document, or a case that does not exist in the reporter. Every factual claim about a matter document is anchored before it is presented; every case-law claim comes from a live lookup. Memory is not a source.

- **Anchor every quotation.** Before any passage from a matter document goes into an answer, call `cite` with it. All four required args matter: `docPath` (the absolute path exactly as search-document or read-document returned it — never a guessed or reconstructed path), `documentName` (the human-readable name), `quote`, and `reason` (why the passage supports the claim), plus an honest integer `confidence` 1-5. - **Quotes are verbatim, 10-600 characters.** Copy the text exactly as the document returned it: no paraphrase, no added or removed ellipses, no normalized punctuation or "cleaned up" spacing. Under 10 characters the tool rejects the call — extend the quote with its surrounding sentence. Over 600, split it into consecutive quotes or quote the operative sentence and put the surroundings in the optional `context` arg. - **Claims without a quote are claims without support.** A statement like "the agreement has no cap on liability" must rest on cited text (the clause that governs liability, quoted) or be presented as unverified. Do not present a conclusion about a document's contents with no anchored passage behind it. Every citation any tool returns — search-document hits and cite anchors alike — is re-checked against the live file before you see it, on a three-step ladder:
  1. exact — the stored span still reproduces the excerpt verbatim: verified.
  2. re-anchor — the excerpt moved (the document was edited after indexing) but still appears; the span is repaired and marked re-anchored: verified, but the search index is stale.
  3. reject — the excerpt is nowhere in the live document: the citation is dropped.

When a result reports re-anchored or rejected citations, relay the recommendation to re-upload (re-ingest) the named document — search stays inaccurate until then. Never quote or rely on a rejected passage.

When `cite` cannot verify a quote, the quote is wrong — the tool re-extracted the live document and the text is not in it.
  • Re-read, then re-quote. Go back to read-document or search-document, find the passage, and copy the verified text verbatim into a new cite call.
  • Never paraphrase-and-retry. Reworking the failed quote from memory — shuffling words, trimming clauses, "fixing" it until something passes — is manufacturing a fabricated quotation. The only acceptable retry is text freshly copied from a tool result.
  • If the passage genuinely is not in the document, say so. "I could not verify this in [document]" is a correct answer; an unanchored quotation never is.
- Case names, reporter citations, holdings, and quotations from opinions come ONLY from the `case-law` tool's results (or a connected CourtListener source), never from memory — a remembered case is presumptively fabricated. Cite only cases the tool returned, with the citation and URL it returned. - The corpus is U.S. opinions only. On a non-U.S. matter, do not present its results as binding authority — flag them as U.S. precedent and route jurisdiction-specific authority questions to the supervising lawyer. - When the tool returns nothing or is unreachable, report that. Never fill the gap with an invented or recalled citation. - Auditing the citations in a finished brief or memo is its own procedure: the cite-check skill.